Supreme Court Denies Umar Khalid's Bail Review Petition in 2020 Delhi Riots Case
Supreme Court rejects Umar Khalid’s review petition to seek bail in 2020 case
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed Umar Khalid's review petition seeking bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. The court found no grounds to reconsider its January 5 ruling, which denied bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), emphasizing the severity of the allegations against Khalid and his co-accused.
- 01Umar Khalid's review petition for bail has been rejected by the Supreme Court.
- 02The court cited a prima facie case against Khalid under the UAPA.
- 03Khalid has been in custody since September 2020, while co-accused Sharjeel Imam has been incarcerated since January 2020.
- 04The court noted that prolonged incarceration does not justify bail under UAPA provisions.
- 05Five other co-accused were granted bail, indicating different levels of involvement.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Supreme Court of India has rejected the review petition filed by Umar Khalid, a former student of Jawaharlal Nehru University, seeking bail in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. This decision follows the court's earlier ruling on January 5, which denied him bail under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), stating that there exists a prima facie case against him and co-accused Sharjeel Imam, who are alleged to have played a central role in the conspiracy that led to communal violence in northeast Delhi, resulting in 53 deaths and hundreds of injuries. Khalid has been in custody since September 13, 2020, while Imam has been incarcerated since January 28, 2020. The Supreme Court emphasized that the severity of the allegations and the nature of the case take precedence over the duration of incarceration. Although five other co-accused were granted bail, the court clarified that Khalid and Imam's involvement was qualitatively different, justifying their continued detention. The court also noted that the lengthy time in custody does not automatically warrant bail under UAPA, which requires a thorough evaluation of the case specifics.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling affects the ongoing legal proceedings related to the Delhi riots, impacting the accused's ability to secure bail and the broader implications for similar cases under UAPA.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the UAPA is being applied fairly in this case?
Connecting to poll...
More about Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail for Umar Khalid in 2020 Delhi Riots Case
Ndtv • Apr 20, 2026

Supreme Court to Review Plea for SIT or CBI Probe in Ghaziabad Rape-Murder Case
Hindustan Times • Apr 20, 2026

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea on Netaji Bose's Role in Indian Independence
News 18 • Apr 20, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


