Delhi High Court Rejects Kejriwal's Plea for Judge Recusal in Excise Policy Case
Unfounded allegations won't decide benches: Delhi HC rejects Kejriwal plea
News 18
Image: News 18
The Delhi High Court dismissed Arvind Kejriwal's request for Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma to recuse herself from the excise policy case, stating that the allegations of bias were unfounded. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining judicial integrity and not allowing unsubstantiated claims to influence judicial proceedings.
- 01The Delhi High Court found Kejriwal's bias allegations against Justice Sharma unsubstantiated.
- 02The court stressed that judicial integrity must not be compromised by mere suspicion.
- 03Justice Sharma clarified that her children's professional roles do not imply bias.
- 04The court rejected claims that prior Supreme Court rulings justified recusal.
- 05The dismissal of the plea allows the excise policy case to proceed on its merits.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On April 20, 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed a plea by Arvind Kejriwal (chief of the Aam Aadmi Party) seeking the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from the excise policy case. The court ruled that the allegations of bias were unfounded and did not meet the legal standard for a reasonable apprehension of bias. Justice Sharma emphasized that accepting such pleas based on mere suspicion would undermine the judicial process and institutional integrity. She noted that the allegations were based on insinuations rather than solid evidence, warning that allowing such claims could set a troubling precedent. The court also addressed concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest due to Justice Sharma's children being empaneled as Central Government counsel, stating that this alone does not imply bias unless a direct connection to the case is proven. The court highlighted that judicial functions cannot be influenced by public criticism or unfounded allegations, reinforcing the importance of judicial independence. With the recusal plea rejected, the High Court is poised to continue with the excise policy case, which involves challenges against the discharge of Kejriwal and others by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision reinforces judicial independence and integrity, ensuring that political figures cannot manipulate judicial processes through unfounded allegations.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judicial recusal requests should be based on substantial evidence?
Connecting to poll...
More about Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Judge Denies Kejriwal's Recusal Request in Liquor Policy Case
Ndtv • Apr 20, 2026

Delhi High Court Upholds Government Policy on EWS Job Relaxations
Business Standard • Apr 17, 2026

Delhi High Court to Protect Allu Arjun's Personality Rights from Unauthorized Use
Hindustan Times • Apr 17, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



