Tata Trusts is facing a significant leadership crisis as CEO Siddharth Sharma allegedly concealed important legal information when requesting the resignations of vice-chairmen Venu Srinivasan and Vijay Singh. Srinivasan, who has already stepped down, claims that he was not adequately informed about a legal opinion from former Chief Justice of India MH Kania regarding trustee eligibility, which he argues was crucial to their decision. Singh, who has not resigned, echoed concerns about the governance practices within the trust, particularly in light of a petition by trustee Mehli Mistry questioning their eligibility based on community membership criteria. Mistry contends that both vice-chairmen do not meet the necessary conditions to serve as trustees, which has fueled further disputes. Kania's opinion indicates that there are no legal barriers preventing non-Zoroastrians from holding trustee positions, contradicting Mistry's claims. This internal strife reflects broader governance challenges within Tata Trusts, especially following the death of long-time leader Ratan Tata in December 2024, raising questions about the future direction and management of the organization.