Delhi High Court Justice Recuses from Excise Policy Case Involving Arvind Kejriwal
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma Recuses From Excise Policy Case Against Arvind Kejriwal, Others
News 18
Image: News 18
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has recused herself from hearing the excise policy case against former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and others, citing contemptuous social media attacks against her. She will proceed with contempt proceedings against Kejriwal for allegedly defamatory posts targeting her and the court.
- 01Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma recuses from the excise policy case against Arvind Kejriwal.
- 02She will initiate contempt proceedings against Kejriwal and other Aam Aadmi Party leaders.
- 03The judge cited vilifying social media posts as the reason for her recusal.
- 04Kejriwal's actions were described as an attempt to undermine judicial authority.
- 05The judge emphasized that unchecked vilification of judges threatens the justice system.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has decided to recuse herself from the excise policy case involving former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other senior leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). This decision follows her observation of contemptuous social media posts targeting her and the court, which she deemed as defamatory and vilifying. Justice Sharma expressed concern over the implications of such conduct, stating that it undermines the authority of the judiciary. She noted that Kejriwal orchestrated a campaign of vilification instead of addressing the court's orders through appropriate legal channels. The judge will continue to hear contempt proceedings against Kejriwal and others, emphasizing the need to protect judicial integrity from external pressures and threats. Previously, Kejriwal and others had questioned the judge's neutrality, but their applications for recusal were dismissed, prompting public commentary and political messaging against the court.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The developments in this case highlight the tensions between political figures and the judiciary, potentially affecting public trust in the legal system.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think political leaders should be held accountable for their statements about the judiciary?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


