London's ULEZ Tax Fails to Significantly Improve Air Quality, New Data Reveals
Sadiq Khan's £12.50-a-day ULEZ tax on drivers has not improved London air quality as much as mayor claims, new figures show
Mail Online
Image: Mail Online
New data reveals that Sadiq Khan's £12.50-a-day Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) has not significantly improved air quality in London, with over half of boroughs still reporting illegal nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels. Critics argue that the Mayor's claims of success are misleading.
- 01More than half of London's boroughs are still recording illegal nitrogen dioxide levels, contrary to claims by Mayor Sadiq Khan.
- 02Local air quality monitors show that some areas exceed the legal NO2 limit of 40 micrograms per cubic metre.
- 03The charity Asthma + Lung UK highlights the need for transparency in air quality data, especially for those with lung conditions.
- 04Critics accuse Khan of cherry-picking data to support his agenda, while the City Hall defends the ULEZ's impact on reducing pollution.
- 05Defra's air quality statistics differ from local authority data, leading to discrepancies in reported pollution levels.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Recent analyses indicate that Sadiq Khan's Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), which charges drivers £12.50 per day, has not effectively improved air quality in London as claimed. Official data from local councils shows that over half of the boroughs continue to report illegal nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels, primarily emitted from diesel vehicles. Despite a report from the Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra) stating that London met legal NO2 limits for the first time in 2024, monitoring stations in areas like Romford and the City of London recorded levels nearly double the legal threshold. Critics, including the charity Asthma + Lung UK, argue that the government is underreporting pollution levels and that local monitoring data should be prioritized. Susan Hall, leader of the City Hall Conservatives, accused Khan of selectively using data to advance his agenda. Although City Hall claims significant improvements in air quality due to ULEZ, experts emphasize that many areas still exceed legal limits, raising concerns about public health and the accuracy of air quality reporting.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The failure to improve air quality significantly affects public health, particularly for the 12 million people in the UK living with lung conditions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the ULEZ is effective in improving air quality in London?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



