US National Wins Tax Dispute Over ₹11 Lakh Deposit During Demonetisation in India
US-based son gets tax notice in India over Rs 11 lakh cash deposit made on behalf of parents during demonetisation; ITAT Delhi cancels notice for this reason
The Economic TimesImage: The Economic Times
Mr. Bussi, a US-based salaried employee, successfully contested a tax notice issued by the Indian Income Tax Department regarding a ₹11 lakh cash deposit made on behalf of his parents during the 2016 demonetisation. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Delhi ruled in his favor, emphasizing the legitimacy of his remittances.
- 01Mr. Bussi deposited ₹11 lakh in his parents' bank account during India's demonetisation.
- 02The Income Tax Department issued a tax notice, claiming the funds were unexplained income.
- 03After nearly six years of legal battles, the ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of Mr. Bussi.
- 04The ruling highlighted the importance of recognizing legitimate remittances from NRIs.
- 05Tax authorities must prove alternative undisclosed sources before classifying funds as unexplained.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Mr. Bussi, a resident of Georgia, USA, faced a tax notice from the Indian Income Tax Department after depositing ₹11 lakh (approximately $13,200 USD) in his parents' ICICI Bank account during the demonetisation period in November 2016. The funds were remitted to his parents through MoneyGram between 2014 and 2016. The tax department flagged the deposit as unexplained income, leading to a prolonged legal battle that lasted nearly six years. On April 8, 2026, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi ruled in Mr. Bussi's favor, stating that the cash deposit was likely sourced from his legitimate remittances. The tribunal emphasized that his elderly parents could not be expected to maintain detailed records of their finances. The ruling is significant for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) as it reinforces that genuine remittances should not be classified as unexplained income without substantial evidence from tax authorities. Chartered Accountant Priyal Goel Jain noted that the decision underscores the need for tax authorities to demonstrate alternative undisclosed sources before invoking punitive measures.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling provides clarity for NRIs regarding the treatment of remittances and cash deposits, potentially reducing tax disputes for similar cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think the tax authorities should provide clearer guidelines for NRI remittances?
Connecting to poll...
More about Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


