Allahabad High Court Questions Conflict of Interest for UP Government Advocates
Conflict of interest: Can UP govt advocates represent pvt individuals against state, queries HC
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Allahabad High Court in Lucknow has asked the Uttar Pradesh government to clarify whether state-paid lawyers can represent private individuals against the government. This inquiry arises from a case involving alleged disobedience of a court order by government officials, raising concerns over potential conflicts of interest for advocates serving dual roles.
- 01The court is questioning the legality of state lawyers representing private clients against the government.
- 02Justice Saurabh Lavania raised the issue during a contempt petition hearing.
- 03The case involves allegations of wilful disobedience by government officials.
- 04The court seeks input from the Legal Remembrancer on the matter.
- 05A formal response from the Uttar Pradesh government is expected by May 18.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh government to clarify whether state-paid advocates can represent private individuals in lawsuits against the state. This inquiry was initiated by Justice Saurabh Lavania during a contempt petition hearing on May 8, concerning a case filed by Ashok Kumar Singh and 28 others, who alleged that government officials had engaged in wilful disobedience of a court order issued in 2025. The court noted that the advocate representing the petitioners, Sudhir Kumar Mishra, is currently serving as an Additional Government Advocate (AGA), which raised questions about the dual role of state lawyers. The court is particularly focused on the terms of the retainership agreements for AGAs and whether they create a conflict of interest that should prevent them from taking cases against the government. By involving the Legal Remembrancer, the court aims to establish a clear precedent regarding the conduct of government-contracted lawyers in private practice. The Uttar Pradesh government has been asked to provide a formal response, with the matter scheduled for further review on May 18.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling could redefine the legal boundaries for government lawyers in Uttar Pradesh, potentially affecting how they manage their dual roles.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should government lawyers be allowed to represent private clients against the state?
Connecting to poll...
More about Uttar Pradesh government
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





