Delhi High Court Defers CBI Plea Hearing in Excise Policy Case to May 11
Excise policy case: Delhi High Court to hear CBI plea on May 11
The Hindu
Image: The Hindu
The Delhi High Court has postponed the hearing on the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) petition challenging the discharge of several accused, including AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, to May 11. The court is awaiting consent from lawyers to represent the leaders, who have not appointed counsel.
- 01Delhi High Court hearing on CBI's plea is set for May 11.
- 02Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is waiting for lawyers to represent AAP leaders.
- 03The trial court previously discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia, and others, citing weak prosecution.
- 04Justice Sharma noted potential errors in the trial court's findings.
- 05Kejriwal and others sought the judge's recusal over alleged bias, which was denied.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Delhi High Court has deferred the hearing on the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) petition challenging the discharge of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders, including Arvind Kejriwal (Chief Minister of Delhi) and Manish Sisodia (former Deputy Chief Minister), to May 11. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma stated that she is awaiting consent from senior lawyers to represent the leaders, who have not appointed counsel. During the proceedings, the court acknowledged applications from discharged accused Vijay Nair and Arvind Kumar Singh, questioning the maintainability of the CBI's petition. On February 27, the trial court had discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia, and 21 others, citing that the prosecution's case was unable to withstand judicial scrutiny. Justice Sharma had previously stayed the trial court's recommendation for departmental action against the CBI investigating officer. The judge observed that some findings of the trial court appeared erroneous and required consideration. Following this, Kejriwal and others requested the judge's recusal, alleging conflict of interest due to the judge's children being central government lawyers. On April 20, Justice Sharma declined the recusal plea, emphasizing that judges cannot recuse themselves based on unfounded apprehensions of bias.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this case could influence the political landscape in Delhi, particularly for the AAP party, and affect public perception of governance and accountability.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the CBI's actions in this case are justified?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





