Family Court Denies Father's Request to Reduce Child Support Payments
Family Court rejects dad’s claim ex-wife was wealthier in child support case
Image: Nzherald
Carl Eddowes, a father seeking to lower his child support payments, failed to prove his ex-wife's superior financial status in court. He is liable for payments due to not meeting the legal threshold to be recognized as a primary carer for his children.
- 01Carl Eddowes claimed his ex-wife was financially better off than him.
- 02The court rejected his request due to lack of evidence.
- 03Eddowes's visitation with his children fell short of the legal threshold for primary care status.
- 04He has been disputing the level of child support payments for some time.
- 05The ruling emphasizes the importance of evidence in child support cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Carl Eddowes, a father living away from his teenage children, sought to reduce his child support payments by claiming that his ex-wife was in a better financial position. However, his request was denied by the Family Court as he failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. The court noted that Eddowes did not meet the legal threshold to be recognized as the primary carer of his children, as he only saw them one day short of the required time each year. Consequently, he remains liable for the disputed child support payments.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think child support payments should be adjusted based on the financial status of both parents?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.