Witness in Dera Castration Case Denied Remote Testimony from the US
Dera castration case witness denied permission to depose from US home
The Times Of IndiaImage: The Times Of India
A special CBI court in Panchkula has denied a witness's request to testify via video conferencing from the US in the Dera Sacha Sauda castration case involving Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. The court also rejected a plea for a six-week delay between hearings.
- 01The witness, identified as PW-2, sought to testify from his US home due to concerns about travel.
- 02The court found the witness did not provide his exact US address, complicating coordination with Indian diplomatic missions.
- 03Special judicial magistrate Anil Kumar Yadav emphasized the need for expeditious trial proceedings, referencing Supreme Court directives.
- 04The court clarified that current rules do not allow for recording testimony directly from a witness's residence via video conferencing.
- 05The next hearing for prosecution evidence is scheduled for June 8.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a significant development in the ongoing Dera Sacha Sauda castration case, a special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court in Panchkula has rejected a request from a prosecution witness to provide testimony from his home in the United States via video conferencing. The witness, known as PW-2, had also requested a six-week postponement between hearings. The court, led by special judicial magistrate Anil Kumar Yadav, noted that the witness failed to disclose his precise residential address in the US, which hindered the ability to coordinate with the nearest Indian embassy or consulate for facilitating the video testimony. The magistrate instructed the witness to submit his correct address or details of the nearest Indian mission within 24 hours. Furthermore, the court reiterated that current regulations do not permit evidence to be recorded directly from a witness's residence through video conferencing. The case, which involves allegations against Dera chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and two doctors for the forced castration of sadhus, is set to resume with prosecution evidence on June 8.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision affects the timeline of the trial and the ability of witnesses to provide testimony remotely, which could influence the overall proceedings.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think witnesses should be allowed to testify remotely in legal cases?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

