The controversy surrounding the use of the term 'Brahminical patriarchy' in an examination question at Banaras Hindu University (BHU) has drawn the attention of the Prime Minister's Office (PMO). The PMO has requested a detailed report from the university administration, particularly concerning a question posed in the MA History (Fourth Semester) examination for the course titled 'Women in Modern Indian Society.' The question asked students to discuss the implications of 'Brahminical patriarchy' on women's progress in ancient India. This has led to significant backlash from various political, academic, and religious groups, who argue that the question reflects ideological bias in educational assessments. Notably, Congress city president Raghvendra Chaubey criticized the use of such terms in academia, suggesting they could foster negative perceptions of certain societal groups. He emphasized the need for educational institutions to promote unity and factual history, rather than ideological narratives. The PMO's involvement highlights the broader implications of this debate on academic freedom and the role of established sociological terms in higher education. As the situation evolves, it is likely to remain a focal point of scrutiny in both political and academic spheres.