&w=1200&q=75)
Supreme Court Upholds Wildlife Transfer Procedures, Dismisses Reopening Plea
‘Settled And Vested Right’: SC Dismisses Plea To Reopen Vantara Wildlife Transfer Case
Image: News 18
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to reopen investigations into wildlife transfers linked to Vantara, affirming that a 'settled and vested right' had been established. The court directed improvements in compliance with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and recognized Vantara's significant conservation efforts.
- 01The Supreme Court ruled that previous findings by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) regarding Vantara's wildlife transfers have attained finality.
- 02The court found no evidence of illegal animal imports or commercial activities related to the transfers examined.
- 03Vantara's conservation work, including breeding programs for endangered species, was acknowledged as globally significant.
- 04The court mandated the CITES Management Authority of India to enhance regulatory frameworks for wildlife imports.
- 05Vantara's CEO expressed gratitude for the ruling, emphasizing the ethical treatment of animals in their care.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to reopen investigations into wildlife transfers associated with Vantara, citing a 'settled and vested right' established by previous findings of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). The court noted that the allegations had already been thoroughly examined, with no evidence found of illegal imports or commercial activities linked to the transfers. The ruling recognized Vantara's contributions to global conservation efforts, including breeding programs for endangered species. Additionally, the court directed the CITES Management Authority of India to strengthen compliance mechanisms, including the development of a Standard Operating Procedure for issuing import permits for live specimens. Vantara welcomed the decision, reaffirming its commitment to ethical wildlife care and conservation. The judgment emphasized that disturbing animals after lawful relocation could constitute cruelty, reinforcing the importance of stable environments for wildlife.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The ruling solidifies legal protections for wildlife transfers and enhances regulatory compliance, potentially affecting conservation practices in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should wildlife transfer cases be reopened based on new evidence?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.