U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Clears Atrazine Weedkiller Amid Controversy
E.P.A. Clears a Weedkiller, Saying It Won’t Push Species to Extinction
The New York Times
Image: The New York Times
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that atrazine, a widely used weedkiller, does not pose an extinction risk to threatened species, allowing its continued use. This decision has sparked controversy, as environmental groups argue it endangers wildlife and human health, contrasting with previous findings by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
- 01Atrazine is applied at an average of 72 million pounds annually on 75 million acres of crops, primarily corn.
- 02The primary manufacturer of atrazine is Syngenta, owned by the Chinese conglomerate Sinochem.
- 03Environmental groups and health advocates, including supporters of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., are calling for a ban on atrazine.
- 04The Fish and Wildlife Service's findings diverge from a 2021 EPA determination that atrazine was likely to harm over 1,000 protected species.
- 05Agricultural groups argue that losing access to atrazine could significantly reduce crop yields and increase food prices.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has released a review stating that atrazine, a herbicide commonly used on corn and other crops, does not threaten endangered species, thereby justifying its continued use. This conclusion marks a significant victory for agricultural groups like the Farm Bureau Federation and the National Corn Growers Association, who argue that atrazine is crucial for maintaining crop yields and controlling costs. Annually, farmers use approximately 72 million pounds of atrazine across 75 million acres of farmland. However, this decision has drawn ire from environmental advocates and health proponents, including those aligned with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have called for a ban due to concerns about the herbicide's links to hormonal disruptions in wildlife and potential health risks in humans. This latest finding is in stark contrast to a 2021 determination by the Environmental Protection Agency, which indicated that atrazine could harm over 1,000 protected species. The Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that minor changes could mitigate the risks posed by atrazine to endangered species, a stance that has reignited the ongoing debate over the herbicide's safety and environmental impact.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The decision to allow continued use of atrazine may affect agricultural practices, potentially influencing crop yields and food prices for consumers.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should the use of atrazine be banned due to its environmental impact?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



