USC Study Compares Leading Therapies for ALK+ Lung Cancer to Improve Treatment Choices
USC comparison study of leading targeted therapies for a specific lung cancer could lead to better treatment decisions
University Of Southern California
Image: University Of Southern California
Researchers from the University of Southern California have conducted a significant study comparing five targeted therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer. The study, published in the journal Lung Cancer, indicates that alectinib offers the best survival rates among the therapies analyzed, which could guide treatment decisions for patients and physicians.
- 01The study utilized insurance claims data from 940 patients treated for ALK+ lung cancer between 2016 and 2024.
- 02Alectinib demonstrated a median survival of 46.5 months, significantly longer than crizotinib.
- 03Lorlatinib showed potential benefits but results were not statistically significant.
- 04The findings suggest that newer targeted therapies may benefit patients typically excluded from clinical trials.
- 05Future analyses could influence guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A team from the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California conducted a pioneering study comparing five leading treatments for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer. This research, published in the journal Lung Cancer, is the first to analyze the effectiveness of lorlatinib and brigatinib outside clinical trials. ALK+ lung cancer, which affects about 4% of lung cancer patients, often occurs in non-smokers and is driven by a faulty protein due to ALK gene mutations. The study analyzed data from 940 patients treated between 2016 and 2024, revealing that alectinib provided the longest median survival at 46.5 months and the longest treatment duration at 33.5 months. While lorlatinib showed promise, its benefits were not statistically significant. The research emphasizes the importance of real-world studies, as clinical trials often exclude patients with comorbidities, making the findings more applicable to broader patient populations. The results could influence future treatment guidelines, helping healthcare providers make more informed decisions based on a patient's overall health and cancer stage.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The findings can guide treatment decisions for patients with ALK+ lung cancer, potentially improving survival rates and quality of care.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
How important is it to have real-world data in cancer treatment decisions?
Connecting to poll...
More about University of Southern California

Celebrating Excellence: Highlights from the 92nd Annual USC Alumni Awards
University Of Southern California • May 22, 2026

Celebrating Linda K. Sharp: A Pioneer in Women's Basketball at USC
University Of Southern California • May 22, 2026

College Football Recruiting Update: Financial Tactics and Key Commitments Shape Landscape
Theathleticuk • May 21, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




