Supreme Court Questions Executive Control in Chief Election Commissioner Appointments
SC flags ‘executive veto’ in CEC appointment
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns over the 'executive veto' in the appointment process for the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs), highlighting the lack of judicial representation in the selection panel. The court is reviewing the constitutionality of the newly enacted CEC and EC (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023.
- 01The Supreme Court questions the executive's control over CEC and EC appointments.
- 02The newly enacted law replaces the Chief Justice of India with a Union minister in the selection panel.
- 03Concerns were raised about the independence of the Election Commission of India.
- 04The court is considering whether to refer the matter to a larger bench for further examination.
- 05Petitioners argue that the law violates constitutional provisions for free and fair elections.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Supreme Court of India on Thursday addressed concerns regarding the 'executive veto' in the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs). During a hearing on petitions challenging the CEC and EC (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, the court criticized the composition of the selection panel, which includes a Union minister and the Leader of Opposition, effectively granting a 2:1 majority to the executive. This arrangement raises questions about the independence of the Election Commission of India (ECI), as the law was enacted shortly after a Supreme Court ruling that included the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in the selection process. The court expressed concerns over the lack of judicial oversight, stating that the ECI should be insulated from executive control to maintain the integrity of elections. The Attorney General defended the law, arguing that it ensures procedural transparency and that past appointments have not compromised election integrity. The court is contemplating whether to refer the matter to a larger bench for further deliberation, with a hearing scheduled for May 19.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this case could significantly affect the independence of the Election Commission of India, which plays a crucial role in ensuring free and fair elections.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the appointment process for the Chief Election Commissioner should include judicial oversight?
Connecting to poll...
More about Election Commission of India

Election Commission Launches Third Phase of Special Intensive Revision Across 16 States and 3 Union Territories
Hindustan Times • May 15, 2026

Punjab to Begin Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls on June 15
Hindustan Times • May 15, 2026

Delhi's Census Self-Enumeration Concludes as Electoral Roll Revision Begins
Hindustan Times • May 15, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


