Inquiry Critiques Minns Government's Grant Scheme as 'Election Slush Fund'
Inquiry calls Minns government grants scheme for Labor candidates an ‘election slush fund’
The Guardian
Image: The Guardian
A parliamentary inquiry has labeled a grant scheme by the Minns government as an 'election slush fund' for Labor candidates in New South Wales, Australia. The inquiry found that the program, which allocated $400,000 to projects in each candidate's seat, was mismanaged and led to misleading statements by officials, including Minister John Graham.
- 01The LSCA program allocated $400,000 to Labor candidates regardless of election outcomes.
- 02The inquiry found misleading statements made by officials, including Minister John Graham.
- 03Former MP Cherie Burton and staffer Paul Mills are accused of making false statements under oath.
- 04The inquiry chair criticized the program as a misuse of public funds for political gain.
- 05Recommendations include amending the Electoral Act to prevent unethical campaign practices.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A parliamentary inquiry into the Local Small Commitments Allocation (LSCA) program by the Minns government in New South Wales has deemed it an 'election slush fund' for Labor candidates. The program allowed candidates to allocate $400,000 to projects in their electorates, funded regardless of election outcomes. The inquiry, led by Greens MLC Abigail Boyd, criticized the program for being anti-democratic and primarily aimed at influencing voters. It alleged that Minister John Graham misled parliament and that former Kogarah MP Cherie Burton, now a senior adviser, and staffer Paul Mills made false statements under oath. The inquiry's report suggests that only 17 out of 93 candidates were assessed for conflicts of interest, leading to inadequate oversight. It also claims that $6.4 million was unlawfully redirected from original projects, undermining the program's integrity. The inquiry recommends amending the state's Electoral Act to curb unethical campaign practices and adopting the audit office's recommendations for better conflict of interest management. The government, however, has rejected the inquiry's findings, labeling it a politically motivated attack.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The findings could lead to changes in how public funds are allocated for electoral projects, potentially affecting future campaign strategies and funding transparency.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe government funding should be allocated based on electoral outcomes?
Connecting to poll...
More about New South Wales Government
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



