Divergent Views Among Allahabad High Court Judges on Human Rights Commissions
Two Allahabad high court judges differ on functioning of human rights commissions in India
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
Two judges from the Allahabad High Court have issued separate interim orders regarding the effectiveness of human rights commissions in India. Justice Atul Sreedharan criticized the commissions for failing to address violence against Muslims, while Justice Vivek Saran disagreed with Sreedharan's sweeping statements and emphasized the need for all parties to be heard.
- 01Justice Atul Sreedharan criticized human rights commissions for not addressing violence against Muslims.
- 02Justice Vivek Saran disagreed with Sreedharan's observations, calling for proper representation of all parties.
- 03The court was hearing a petition related to the functioning of madrasas and NHRC orders.
- 04Sreedharan questioned the NHRC's jurisdiction in certain matters.
- 05The case highlights ongoing concerns regarding human rights issues in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a recent case at the Allahabad High Court, two judges expressed differing opinions on the role of human rights commissions in India. Justice Atul Sreedharan criticized the commissions for their inaction regarding the assaults and lynching of Muslims, stating that they have failed to take suo motu cognizance of such incidents. He issued notices to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to respond to these concerns. Conversely, Justice Vivek Saran disagreed with Sreedharan's broad statements, emphasizing the importance of hearing all parties involved before making definitive observations. The court was addressing a petition from the Teachers Association Madaris Arabia, which challenged several NHRC orders regarding the investigation of madrasas. Sreedharan highlighted the NHRC's focus on issues outside its jurisdiction, while Saran called for due process in judicial proceedings. This case underscores the complexities surrounding human rights enforcement in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The differing opinions of the judges may influence how human rights commissions operate in India, particularly concerning their jurisdiction and responsiveness to violence against marginalized communities.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe human rights commissions in India are effective in addressing violence against marginalized communities?
Connecting to poll...
More about National Human Rights Commission
Allahabad High Court Divided Over NHRC Probe into Madrasas in Uttar Pradesh
Hindustan Times • Apr 30, 2026
Differing Opinions in Allahabad High Court on NHRC Inquiry into Madrassas
Hindustan Times • Apr 29, 2026
Accused in Noida Protests Linked to Manesar Violence, Faces Court Hearing
The Indian Express • Apr 29, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.