Supreme Court Acquits Jharkhand Constable After 12 Years Due to Insufficient Evidence
SC acquits J’khand constable after 12 yrs in jail citing ‘weak’ evidence
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Supreme Court of India acquitted Jay Prakash Yadav, a former constable of the Indian Reserve Battalion, after he spent nearly 12 years in prison for a murder conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence. The court highlighted significant flaws in the prosecution's case and ordered his immediate release.
- 01Jay Prakash Yadav was sentenced to life imprisonment for the alleged murder of his superior in 2014.
- 02The Supreme Court found critical lapses in the prosecution's case, primarily relying on circumstantial evidence.
- 03Key witness testimony was deemed unreliable due to inconsistencies and lack of clarity.
- 04The absence of a duty register on the day of the incident was identified as a significant flaw.
- 05The court allowed Yadav to seek reinstatement in service with benefits if fit, or financial compensation if unfit.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of Jay Prakash Yadav, a former constable of the Indian Reserve Battalion (IRB), who had been imprisoned for nearly 12 years for the alleged murder of his superior, Sub-Inspector Sunil Soren, in 2014. The incident occurred at the IRBP Piparwar Camp in Jharkhand, where Yadav was accused of shooting Soren after his leave request was denied. The court found that the prosecution's case was based solely on circumstantial evidence, lacking eyewitness accounts. A key witness, a hawaldar, admitted during cross-examination that he could not clearly identify Yadav due to darkness at the time of the incident. The Supreme Court criticized the lower courts for overlooking these significant flaws, including the absence of a duty register on the day of the murder. It ruled that the evidence did not meet the standard required to exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence, granting Yadav the benefit of doubt. The court ordered his immediate release and allowed him to seek reinstatement in service if he is fit, otherwise, he is to receive financial compensation.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Yadav's acquittal highlights issues within the judicial process and the importance of reliable evidence in criminal cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the judicial system in India needs reform to prevent wrongful convictions?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




