The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment in the cheque bounce case involving actor Rajpal Yadav, who was previously imprisoned for this issue. The case, overseen by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, highlighted inconsistencies in Yadav's statements regarding repayment of an outstanding amount. Advocate Avneet Singh Sikka, representing the complainant, argued that Yadav's previous conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act should not exempt him from financial liability. The court explored a potential settlement, with the complainant willing to accept Rs 6 crore as full payment, but Yadav resisted this offer, citing financial strain after selling five flats. He emotionally stated, 'Send me to jail five more times,' indicating his reluctance to settle. The dispute originated in 2010 when Yadav borrowed Rs 5 crore from Murali Projects Pvt Ltd for his film Ata Pata Laapata, which failed commercially. His liability has since increased to nearly Rs 9 crore, and the court expressed frustration over repeated unmet commitments to resolve the matter. Yadav's previous sentence was suspended with assurances for resolution, but non-compliance led to his surrender in February 2026.