MeitY Secretary Clarifies Proposed IT Rules Amendments Not Linked to Recent Content Takedowns
Draft IT rules amendments not linked to recent takedowns: MeitY Secy
Business Standard
Image: Business Standard
S Krishnan, Secretary of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), stated that the proposed amendments to India's IT rules are not related to recent content takedowns. He emphasized that these amendments are clarificatory and do not expand government powers, attributing the rise in takedowns to an increase in deepfake content.
- 01Proposed IT rule amendments are clarificatory and not linked to recent takedowns.
- 02The increase in takedowns is attributed to a rise in synthetically-generated content, particularly deepfakes.
- 03Intermediaries express discomfort with being held responsible for user-generated content.
- 04Concerns over free speech and censorship have intensified amid recent takedown actions.
- 05The Internet Freedom Foundation calls for the complete withdrawal of the proposed amendments.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
S Krishnan, Secretary of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), clarified that the proposed amendments to the Information Technology (IT) rules are not connected to the recent rise in content takedowns. He explained that these changes are merely clarificatory and do not grant the government additional powers. The increase in takedowns over the last few months is largely due to a surge in synthetically-generated content, particularly deepfakes, which has prompted further action. Krishnan noted that the proposed amendments are in response to requests from law enforcement agencies for content preservation and suggestions from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting regarding user-generated news content. Intermediaries have expressed concerns about being held responsible for user-generated content, arguing for a clearer distinction between the responsibilities of news publishers and those of platforms. The debate around social media takedowns has intensified, especially following instances where parody and satire posts were removed, raising concerns about free speech. Advocacy groups like the Internet Freedom Foundation have called for the complete withdrawal of the proposed amendments, arguing they could lead to opaque censorship and violate natural justice principles. The IFF also highlighted the diminishing participation of civil society organizations in discussions about digital rights.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The proposed amendments could significantly affect content creators and intermediaries by imposing stricter regulations and responsibilities, potentially leading to increased censorship.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support the proposed amendments to the IT rules?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

