Supreme Court Concludes Sabarimala Hearing, Judgment Reserved
Sabarimala reference hearing concludes; Supreme Court reserves judgment
The Hindu
Image: The Hindu
The Supreme Court of India has reserved its judgment on the Sabarimala case after a 16-day hearing. The court emphasized its duty to review religious practices to ensure they do not violate fundamental rights, while also acknowledging that reform should primarily come from the legislature.
- 01The Supreme Court highlighted its role in reviewing religious practices for fundamental rights violations.
- 02The Chief Justice stated that courts cannot be passive observers of religious practices.
- 03The case follows the 2018 ruling that lifted the ban on women entering the Sabarimala shrine.
- 04The nine-judge Bench considered broader issues of religious freedoms across various faiths.
- 05The court's decision could impact the rights of women in different religions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, has concluded the hearings on the Sabarimala case, reserving its judgment after 16 days of extensive discussions. The Chief Justice underscored the judiciary's responsibility to review whether religious practices infringe upon fundamental liberties, although he acknowledged that the primary role of reform lies with the legislature. Senior advocate K. Parameshwar, acting as amicus curiae, argued against judging the validity of religious rights based on rationality and advocated for a broader interpretation of 'religious denomination.' This case stems from a 2018 ruling that deemed the ban on women aged 10 to 50 entering the Ayyappa shrine unconstitutional. The court's examination extends to various religious practices, including the rights of Muslim women to enter mosques and the entry of Parsi women into Agiary after inter-faith marriages.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's judgment could redefine the rights of women in religious practices across India, potentially leading to broader reforms in how religious freedoms are interpreted.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the Supreme Court should have the authority to intervene in religious practices?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.