House Democrats Face Backlash for Voting to Cut Food Aid for Vulnerable Families
Four Dems called out for helping Republicans cut food aid for pregnant women and children

Image: Raw Story
The House approved a spending bill that includes $141 million cuts to the WIC program, with crucial support from four Democrats. This decision raises concerns as food prices remain high and more families are expected to rely on assistance during economic challenges.
- 01The House passed a spending bill with a narrow 213-210 vote, cutting $141 million from the WIC program.
- 02Four House Democrats supported the cuts, including Donald Davis (D-NC), Adam Gray (D-CA), Vicente González (D-TX), and Marie Glusenkamp Pérez (D-WA).
- 03Gray, González, and Pérez are part of the conservative Blue Dog Coalition.
- 04The WIC program aids women, infants, and children by providing fruit and vegetable assistance, which is vital during economic downturns.
- 05The cuts are criticized as counterintuitive given the rising food prices and increased enrollment in WIC expected.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The House of Representatives passed a spending bill that includes significant cuts to the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program, totaling $141 million. This decision was reached with a narrow margin of 213-210 votes, and notably, it received crucial backing from four Democrats: Donald Davis (D-NC), Adam Gray (D-CA), Vicente González (D-TX), and Marie Glusenkamp Pérez (D-WA). Among these, Gray, González, and Pérez are affiliated with the conservative Blue Dog Coalition. The WIC program, which operates under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) through the Agriculture Department, specifically provides essential fruit and vegetable assistance to vulnerable populations, particularly mothers and young children. Critics have expressed confusion and concern over the decision to cut funding for a program that supports families during an economic downturn, especially as food prices remain high and WIC enrollment is projected to rise. Observers are questioning the rationale behind reducing such vital assistance at a time when it is needed most.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The cuts to the WIC program could lead to reduced access to nutritional assistance for vulnerable families, particularly during economic hardship.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support the cuts to the WIC program?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





