The recent extension of the ceasefire in the ongoing US-Iran conflict, announced by President Donald Trump, has highlighted the deep divisions between the two nations. Despite the truce, both sides remain entrenched in their positions, with Trump justifying the pause while maintaining military pressure through a blockade on Iranian ports. Iranian leaders have dismissed the ceasefire as a tactic to buy time, signaling a readiness to escalate tensions. Experts suggest that without a credible pathway to resolve core disputes, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program, the conflict risks becoming a 'frozen conflict' — a state where hostilities pause but peace remains elusive. Historical examples, such as the Korean War and the conflict in eastern Ukraine, illustrate how such situations can persist for years, with periodic escalations and underlying tensions. The military imbalance, with the US and Israel holding significant conventional superiority over Iran, further complicates the situation, as Iran resorts to asymmetric tactics to counteract this advantage. The absence of movement on critical issues, including Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence, suggests that a durable settlement is unlikely. If the conflict settles into a frozen state, it could have far-reaching consequences for West Asia, including potential economic disruptions and a regional arms race.