DMK MP Questions Legality of Votes in Tamil Nadu Confidence Motion
Votes secured by Vijay in confidence motion are legally incorrect: DMK MP
The Hindu
Image: The Hindu
P. Wilson, a DMK MP and senior advocate, argues that the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam's claimed 144 votes in the recent confidence motion are legally questionable. He asserts that if disqualified votes are excluded, the total would drop to 118, raising concerns about procedural violations and potential legal challenges.
- 01P. Wilson claims the ruling party's reported 144 votes are legally disputable due to disqualification of certain legislators.
- 02The AIADMK party directed its members to vote against the confidence motion, which could affect the validity of their votes.
- 03Wilson highlights allegations of 'cash-for-votes' that could further invalidate the dissenting votes.
- 04Legal experts suggest that if challenged, the 26 votes from dissenting AIADMK members may be deemed illegal.
- 05Despite the controversy, Wilson acknowledges that the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam would still have a majority with 118 votes.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
P. Wilson, a Rajya Sabha Member of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, has raised significant legal concerns regarding the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam's (TVK) claimed 144 votes during a recent confidence motion in the Tamil Nadu Assembly. He argues that if the 25 rebel members from the AIADMK party and one from the AMMK are disqualified under the anti-defection law, the uncontested total would only be 118 votes. Wilson noted that AIADMK's general secretary, Edappadi K. Palaniswami, had instructed party members to oppose the motion, which he believes constitutes a violation of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Additionally, he pointed to allegations of 'cash-for-votes' involving dissenting AIADMK members, which could further complicate the legitimacy of the voting process. Legal experts suggest that these procedural irregularities could lead to the 26 dissenting votes being declared illegal if challenged in court or by the Governor. Despite these controversies, Wilson acknowledged that the TVK government would still maintain a majority in the Assembly with the support of 118 votes from the DMK and its allies, thereby averting the imposition of President's rule in Tamil Nadu.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The legal challenges surrounding the confidence motion could affect the stability of the Tamil Nadu government and the political landscape in the state.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the votes in the confidence motion were conducted fairly?
Connecting to poll...
More about Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.






