Loren Legarda Challenges Constitutionality of Senate Leadership Changes
Legarda says Senate leadership changes unconstitutional

Image: Inquirer
Senate President Pro Tempore Loren Legarda has raised concerns regarding the legality of recent Senate leadership changes, asserting that they violate the Constitution as only 12 senators were present for the vote, falling short of the required majority of 13 votes.
- 01Loren Legarda argues that the 1987 Constitution mandates a majority vote of all Senate members for leadership elections.
- 02Only 12 senators were present during the recent leadership vote, invalidating the changes according to Legarda.
- 03Legarda cites Rule II, Section 2 of the Senate Rules, which also requires a majority vote for the election of Senate officers.
- 04She disputes comparisons to a 1949 Supreme Court case, stating it should not apply under the current Constitution.
- 05Legarda warns that allowing reduced numbers for leadership elections could disrupt Senate operations in the future.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Loren Legarda, the Senate President Pro Tempore in the Philippines, has publicly questioned the constitutionality of recent leadership changes within the Senate. She argues that the appointment of key officers and committee chairpersons violated both the Constitution and Senate rules, as only 12 senators were present to vote, one short of the required majority of 13 votes. Legarda emphasized that Article VI, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution mandates a majority vote of all Senate members for electing officers. She pointed out that this requirement is echoed in Senate Rules, which state that officers must be elected by a majority vote. Furthermore, she rejected the use of a 1949 Supreme Court ruling to justify the leadership changes, asserting that it is not applicable under the current constitutional framework. Legarda warned that if the Senate allows leadership elections with fewer than the required number of senators, it could lead to significant disruptions in Senate operations, especially when senators are absent for various reasons. She reiterated the importance of upholding the Constitution as a cornerstone of democracy.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The legality of Senate leadership changes could affect future governance and decision-making in the Senate.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think the recent Senate leadership changes were constitutional?
Connecting to poll...
More about Philippine Senate
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.








