Debate Over Government Control of Temples: Centre's Position and Supreme Court's Concerns
Should Govt Control Temples? Centre Says No, But What Is The SC’s Stance? The Debate Explained
News 18
Image: News 18
On April 21, 2023, the Central government of India asserted before the Supreme Court that it opposes direct government control over temples, advocating for religious autonomy. The Supreme Court is reviewing the implications of state authority in managing religious institutions, emphasizing the need for inclusivity and cautioning against absolute independence for religious denominations.
- 01The Central government opposes direct state control over temples, advocating for religious autonomy.
- 02The Supreme Court is examining the balance between state regulation and religious freedom.
- 03Concerns were raised about the potential for societal division if denominations have total independence.
- 04Proponents of state control argue it ensures accountability and prevents fund misappropriation.
- 05Critics claim that state control is discriminatory and undermines the autonomy of Hindu temples compared to other religions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On April 21, 2023, the Central government of India, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, informed the Supreme Court that it does not support government control over temples, advocating for religious autonomy. This statement was made before a nine-judge Constitution Bench examining the state's authority under Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution, particularly in light of ongoing discussions surrounding the Sabarimala temple review petitions. The government's position emphasizes a strict separation between secular management and religious autonomy, asserting that while Article 25(2) allows for state regulation of secular aspects, it should not lead to permanent state control of religious institutions. The Supreme Court raised concerns about the risks of granting denominations absolute power, warning that it could lead to societal division and undermine the inclusive spirit of Hinduism. The court has previously ruled that temple funds belong to the deity and should not be diverted for unrelated purposes. The debate is intensified by the extensive state involvement in temple administration across various Indian states, such as Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Proponents of government oversight argue it ensures accountability and prevents the misappropriation of funds, while critics contend that it is discriminatory and inefficient compared to the self-management of other religious institutions. Possible solutions include creating independent trusts for temple management and establishing local councils for community input in religious practices.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The debate on government control of temples could reshape the management of religious institutions in India, affecting how temple funds are used and who has authority over religious practices.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should the government have a role in managing temples?
Connecting to poll...
More about Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Launches Nationwide Initiative for Faster Dispute Resolution
Hindustan Times • Apr 22, 2026

Lok Sabha Inquiry into Justice Yashwant Varma Concludes Following Resignation
Hindustan Times • Apr 22, 2026

SBI Appeals Supreme Court Ruling on Spectrum as Non-Asset in Insolvency Cases
The Hindu • Apr 22, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


