Toronto Surgeon Ordered to Pay $22.5M for Privacy Violations with Clinic Cameras
Toronto plastic surgeon must pay $22.5M in damages for violating patients' privacy with clinic cameras

Image: National Post
A Toronto plastic surgeon, Dr. Martin Jugenburg, has been ordered to pay $22.5 million in damages for violating patient privacy by installing cameras in sensitive areas of his clinic. The ruling follows a class action lawsuit that revealed the cameras were placed in consultation and operating rooms without patient consent.
- 01Dr. Martin Jugenburg was found negligent for installing 24 surveillance cameras in private areas of his clinic.
- 02The Ontario judge awarded $21.5 million in damages and $1 million in punitive damages to affected patients.
- 03The cameras were located in areas where patients expected privacy, including examination and recovery rooms.
- 04The surveillance system was exposed by a 2018 CBC Marketplace investigation, prompting regulatory action.
- 05Justice Paul Schabas emphasized the importance of patient confidentiality, stating that the clinic's actions caused significant emotional distress.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A Toronto plastic surgeon, Dr. Martin Jugenburg, has been ordered to pay $22.5 million in damages after a court ruled he violated patient privacy by installing 24 cameras in sensitive areas of his clinic. The ruling stemmed from a class action lawsuit where patients claimed that Jugenburg's actions constituted negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. The cameras were placed in locations where patients expected privacy, such as consultation and operating rooms, and were not adequately disclosed to patients. The surveillance system was first revealed in a 2018 undercover investigation by CBC Marketplace, which led to an investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Justice Paul Schabas noted that the clinic's disregard for patient confidentiality was a serious breach, awarding $21.5 million for intrusion upon seclusion and an additional $1 million in punitive damages. While the common-issues phase of the class action has concluded, the judge indicated that individual claims for damages related to emotional distress can still be pursued.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The ruling highlights the critical need for patient privacy and confidentiality in medical settings, affecting how clinics manage surveillance.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What do you think about the use of surveillance cameras in medical clinics?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




