The Supreme Court's hearings on the Sabarimala case took a notable turn when Justice BV Nagarathna humorously criticized the use of unverified digital information, referring to it as 'WhatsApp University.' This remark came during discussions on the intersection of individual rights and religious freedoms. Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul cited a newspaper article advocating for judicial restraint regarding deeply held religious beliefs, prompting Justice Nagarathna's witty retort. The court is currently exploring seven critical questions related to religious autonomy and individual rights, particularly under Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution. Justice Nagarathna has raised concerns about the implications of challenging established legal precedents, warning that doing so could undermine the finality of law. The nine-judge bench is not only addressing the Sabarimala case but also crafting a broader legal framework that could influence other significant religious cases, including the rights of Muslim women in mosques and the entry of Parsi women into Fire Temples. The court's stance indicates a commitment to constitutional principles over fluctuating public opinions or digital misinformation.