Madhya Pradesh High Court Increases Compensation to ₹1.42 Crore for Family of Deceased Techie
ITR can’t be ‘sole basis’ while assessing income: Madhya Pradesh High Court hikes payout over techie’s death to Rs 1.42 crore
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has increased the compensation for the family of Rupesh Kapoor, a software engineer who died in a 2006 road accident, from ₹34.2 lakh to ₹1.42 crore. The court ruled that income tax returns should not be the sole basis for calculating compensation, emphasizing the importance of actual earnings reflected in salary slips and employment records.
- 01Compensation for Rupesh Kapoor's family increased from ₹34.2 lakh to ₹1.42 crore.
- 02The court ruled that income tax returns cannot solely determine compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
- 03The deceased's actual earnings were supported by salary slips and employment records.
- 04The court emphasized the distinction between taxable income and actual earnings.
- 05Future prospects were factored into the compensation calculation due to Kapoor's stable employment.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has significantly increased the compensation for the family of Rupesh Kapoor, a software engineer who died in a 2006 motor accident, from ₹34.2 lakh to ₹1.42 crore. The ruling came after the court found that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had undervalued Kapoor's income by relying solely on his income tax returns, which reported a taxable income of ₹5.86 lakh annually. The court noted that actual earnings, as evidenced by salary slips and employment records, should be considered instead. Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi emphasized that the purpose of compensation law is to account for the actual financial loss suffered by dependants, which is different from taxable income. The court also ruled that the deceased's stable employment and salary progression warranted an additional 50% for future prospects. After recalculating the total compensation, the court determined that the family was entitled to an additional ₹1,08,19,720 with 6% interest, following the tribunal's initial award. This decision reinforces the importance of considering all forms of income when determining compensation in such cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling sets a precedent for future motor accident compensation cases, ensuring that actual earnings are prioritized over taxable income, which could lead to fairer compensation for victims' families.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think actual earnings should be prioritized over taxable income in compensation cases?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

