Justice Sharma Defends Judicial Independence Amid Kejriwal's Family Remarks
'If A Politician's Kid Can Become Politician': Justice Sharma Raps Kejriwal For Mentioning Her Children
News 18
Image: News 18
In the Delhi excise policy case, Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma rebuked former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for comments regarding her family's professional ties. She emphasized the judiciary's independence and the irrelevance of personal matters in court, asserting that familial connections should not impede a judge's impartiality.
- 01Justice Sharma emphasized the need for judicial independence and personal matters' separation from court proceedings.
- 02Kejriwal's comments on the judge's family were deemed irrelevant to the case.
- 03The court stated that familial connections do not equate to bias without clear evidence.
- 04Justice Sharma defended her family's right to pursue legal careers.
- 05Claims of bias must be substantiated with proof to be considered valid.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
During the proceedings of the Delhi excise policy case, Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma issued a strong defense of judicial independence in response to comments made by former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. Kejriwal had mentioned in an affidavit that Justice Sharma's children, who are empanelled as Central government lawyers, receive significant work through Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who represents the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the case. Justice Sharma firmly stated that there is no connection between her family members and the case, asserting that litigants cannot dictate how judges' families live their lives. She highlighted that if children of politicians can enter politics, then judges' children should also be allowed to pursue legal careers without prejudice. The court clarified that allegations of bias must be backed by clear evidence, and mere professional associations do not imply conflict of interest unless directly linked to the case. The judge reiterated that cases are adjudicated based on merit, irrespective of any political affiliations of the lawyers involved.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling reinforces the principle of judicial independence in India, ensuring that judges can operate without personal attacks affecting their impartiality.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe personal connections should be considered in judicial proceedings?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation

Delhi High Court Judge Rejects Kejriwal's Recusal Request Amid Allegations of Bias
Hindustan Times • Apr 20, 2026

Delhi High Court Judge Rejects Recusal Plea in Liquor Policy Case Amid Controversy
News 18 • Apr 20, 2026

Delhi High Court Judge Weighs Recusal Request in Liquor Policy Case Involving Arvind Kejriwal
Hindustan Times • Apr 20, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


