Oaktree Capital Sues BJ’s Wholesale Club Over Tariff Refund Deal
Oaktree Capital Accuses BJ’s of Reneging on Tariff Refund Trade
Mint
Image: Mint
Oaktree Capital Management LP has filed a lawsuit against BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. for allegedly backing out of a deal to sell its rights to approximately $29 million in tariff refunds. The dispute arises as the market value of these claims has surged following favorable rulings related to import tariffs.
- 01Oaktree Capital alleges BJ's reneged on a $20 million agreement for tariff refunds.
- 02The lawsuit claims BJ's exercised a 'Walk Away' provision in bad faith.
- 03Tariff refund claims have increased in value following a recent Supreme Court ruling.
- 04Customs and Border Protection has launched a portal for importers to seek refunds.
- 05Refunds could potentially benefit thousands of importers in the coming months.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Oaktree Capital Management LP has initiated a lawsuit against BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. in New York, claiming that BJ's violated a binding agreement to sell its rights to $29 million in tariff refunds for 70 cents on the dollar. The suit, filed on Monday, accuses BJ's of 'unlawful and bad-faith seller’s remorse' after the market value of the tariff claims increased. Oaktree asserts that a final agreement was reached on March 13, where they would pay BJ's $20 million for the tariff claim. However, BJ's in-house lawyer later informed Oaktree that the company was exercising a 'Walk Away' provision, which Oaktree argues was not intended to be a unilateral cancellation option. This legal battle underscores the rising value of tariff refund claims, particularly following a February ruling by the US Supreme Court that invalidated many of former President Donald Trump’s global trade tariffs. The ruling has led to a scramble for refunds, with Customs and Border Protection recently launching an online portal for importers to seek refunds on approximately $166 billion in tariffs. Refunds could start being issued to thousands of importers in the upcoming months.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
If Oaktree prevails, it could set a precedent for other companies seeking similar refunds, potentially leading to significant financial recoveries for importers.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think companies should be allowed to back out of tariff refund agreements?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



