Officers Sue to Halt DOJ's Controversial 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Two officers in Jan. 6 riot sue to block DOJ "anti-weaponization" fund
Cbs NewsImage: Cbs News
Two law enforcement officers, Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges, have filed a lawsuit to block the creation of a $1.7 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' established by the Justice Department following a settlement with the Trump administration. They argue that the fund could reward individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, undermining their sacrifices during the event.
- 01The lawsuit was filed in federal court in the District of Columbia.
- 02The fund was created as part of a settlement involving President Trump and the federal government.
- 03Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated the fund aims to address claims of weaponization and lawfare.
- 04The fund could allow payouts to individuals convicted of violent behavior during the January 6 riot.
- 05The officers' complaint argues that the fund sends a dangerous message to those who commit violence in Trump's name.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Retired U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn and Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges have filed a lawsuit in the District of Columbia to block the Justice Department's recently announced $1.7 billion 'anti-weaponization fund.' This fund was established as part of a settlement between the Trump administration and the federal government. Dunn and Hodges, who defended the Capitol during the January 6, 2021, riot, argue that the fund is illegal and could potentially reward individuals involved in the violence of that day, including those pardoned by former President Trump. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche described the fund as a means to systematically address claims of weaponization and lawfare. However, the officers contend that the fund's existence poses a direct threat to their safety and undermines their sacrifices. They assert that it sends a chilling message that those who engage in violence in Trump's name may not only evade punishment but also receive financial rewards. The suit seeks to prevent any transfers made by the Treasury Department to implement this fund, which they label as a 'corrupt and illegal monstrosity.'
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this lawsuit could significantly affect the legal and financial landscape for law enforcement officers involved in the January 6 events, as well as the broader implications for how the government addresses claims of weaponization.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support the creation of the anti-weaponization fund?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




