Supreme Court Questions Reservation Benefits for Children of Affluent Families
‘Why should they have it?’: SC questions if children from ‘well-placed’ families get reservation benefits
Image: Hindustan Times
The Supreme Court of India is examining whether children from economically advanced families should continue to receive reservation benefits under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category. Justices raised concerns about the perpetuation of benefits among families that have achieved significant social mobility, indicating that reservations should be limited to those still facing social and educational disadvantages.
- 01The Supreme Court bench is led by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan.
- 02The court is reviewing a Karnataka high court ruling that denied reservation benefits to a candidate from the Kuruba community due to his family's income being above the 'creamy layer' threshold.
- 03The candidate's family income is approximately ₹19.48 lakh annually, with both parents employed in government positions.
- 04Justice Nagarathna emphasized that social mobility should lead to a reassessment of ongoing reservation eligibility.
- 05The court's discussion aligns with a broader judicial trend questioning the applicability of reservations to families that have achieved economic stability.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
During a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, questioned whether children from affluent families should continue to benefit from reservation policies under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category. The court's scrutiny arose from a case involving a candidate from the Kuruba community, who was denied reservation benefits due to his family's income exceeding ₹19.48 lakh annually, classifying them within the 'creamy layer'. Justice Nagarathna highlighted that if both parents are in prestigious government positions, such as IAS officers, the rationale for granting reservation benefits to their children diminishes. The bench expressed concern that ongoing reservations for upwardly mobile families could undermine the original intent of affirmative action, which aims to uplift those who are still socially and educationally disadvantaged. This discussion reflects a growing judicial sentiment that challenges the continuation of reservation benefits for families that have already achieved significant social mobility. The court is set to further examine the criteria for determining creamy layer status, particularly in relation to government employees.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling could significantly affect the eligibility of many families in Karnataka and potentially across India, reshaping the landscape of reservation benefits.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should reservation benefits be limited to families still facing social and economic disadvantages?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.