Delhi High Court Dismisses SpiceJet's Review Plea on Rs 144 Crore Payment to Kalanithi Maran
HC junks SpiceJet's plea to review Rs 144-Cr payment order in dispute with Maran
News 18
Image: News 18
The Delhi High Court has dismissed SpiceJet's plea to review a previous order requiring the airline to pay ₹144 crore (approximately $17.3 million USD) to media mogul Kalanithi Maran. The court imposed a ₹50,000 penalty and directed immediate payment, emphasizing that SpiceJet's financial distress does not alter its legal obligations.
- 01Delhi High Court dismissed SpiceJet's review plea regarding a ₹144 crore payment.
- 02The court imposed a ₹50,000 penalty on SpiceJet and its promoter, Ajay Singh.
- 03SpiceJet's claim of financial distress was rejected as a valid reason for delay.
- 04The dispute originates from a 2015 transfer of SpiceJet's ownership to Singh.
- 05The court highlighted that financial conditions have not changed since the Supreme Court's arbitration award.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On May 4, 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed SpiceJet's plea to review an order mandating the airline to deposit ₹144 crore (approximately $17.3 million USD) in favor of Kalanithi Maran, a prominent media tycoon, and Kal Airways. Justice Subramonium Prasad imposed a cost of ₹50,000 on SpiceJet and its promoter, Ajay Singh, while directing them to deposit the amount immediately. The court noted that SpiceJet's financial distress, exacerbated by the conflict in West Asia, could not be used as a justification for non-compliance with the arbitration award issued by the Supreme Court in July 2023. The court criticized SpiceJet for attempting to exploit the situation and reiterated that the financial health of the airline had not improved since the award was made executable. The ongoing dispute traces back to February 2015 when Singh regained control of SpiceJet amid a financial crisis, during which Maran and Kal Airways transferred their significant stake in the airline for a nominal amount. This latest ruling underscores the court's commitment to uphold the enforcement of arbitration awards, regardless of the financial challenges faced by the airline.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling may exacerbate SpiceJet's existing financial challenges, potentially affecting its operations and service delivery.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should the government intervene to support SpiceJet during its financial difficulties?
Connecting to poll...
More about SpiceJet

Delhi High Court Denies SpiceJet's Request to Review ₹144 Crore Payment Order in Maran Dispute
Business Standard • May 4, 2026

Delhi High Court Denies SpiceJet's Plea to Avoid ₹144.5 Crore Deposit in Dispute with Maran Group
Mint • May 4, 2026

भारतीय विमानन कंपनियों ने अंतरराष्ट्रीय उड़ानों में 25% की कटौती की
Business Standard • May 3, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



