Court Upholds Justification of SAS Soldier's Shooting of IRA Driver
SAS soldier was justified in shooting IRA driver, court rules
The Bbc
Image: The Bbc
The Court of Appeal in the UK ruled that an SAS soldier was justified in shooting unarmed IRA driver Tony Doris during a 1991 incident in County Tyrone. The court affirmed that the soldier acted proportionately in a lethal situation involving a threat to life from Doris and two armed IRA accomplices.
- 01The Court of Appeal upheld the coroner's finding that the SAS soldier acted justifiably.
- 02Tony Doris was shot while attempting to flee in a stolen car with armed IRA members.
- 03The court rejected claims that Doris posed a lesser threat than his armed companions.
- 04The incident occurred during a security operation aimed at preventing an attack on security forces.
- 05The ruling emphasizes the soldier's belief in an imminent threat to life.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Court of Appeal in the United Kingdom has ruled that an SAS soldier, referred to as Soldier B, was justified in shooting IRA driver Tony Doris during a confrontation in County Tyrone in June 1991. The court dismissed challenges to the coroner's verdict, which found that Doris was part of a collective threat alongside two armed IRA members, Peter Ryan and Lawrence McNally. The incident involved the soldiers firing up to 150 rounds as they intercepted the trio, who were suspected of planning an attack on security forces. Lady Chief Justice Dame Siobhan Keegan stated that it was reasonable for Soldier B to perceive the occupants of the car as a unified threat, thereby justifying his use of lethal force. The court's decision reinforces the coroner's conclusion that the soldier acted proportionately in a dangerous situation, where he believed lives were at risk. The appeal was initiated by Doris's relatives, who argued that he was wrongly executed as he was unarmed, but the court found their claims unsubstantiated.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling may affect public perceptions of military engagement rules and the legal standards for use of force in similar situations.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you agree with the court's ruling on the SAS soldier's actions?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



