Delhi Court Dismisses Case Against BJP Leader Kapil Mishra Due to Complainant's Absence
Court closes proceedings against BJP’s Kapil Mishra
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
A Delhi court has dismissed proceedings against Kapil Mishra, a leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), related to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots. The court noted the complainant's repeated absence and lack of interest in pursuing the case as reasons for the dismissal.
- 01Delhi court dismissed the case against Kapil Mishra due to the complainant's absence.
- 02The complainant, Mohammad Iliyas, failed to appear in court for three hearings.
- 03The court criticized the complainant's conduct as delaying the proceedings.
- 04Iliyas had alleged Mishra's involvement in blocking roads and damaging property during protests.
- 05The case was originally converted from an application to a complaint requiring evidence.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A Delhi court has officially closed proceedings against Kapil Mishra, a prominent leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), concerning his alleged involvement in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots. The court's decision, made by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ashwini Panwar at Rouse Avenue, was primarily based on the absence of the complainant, Mohammad Iliyas, who failed to appear for three consecutive hearings. The court noted that this absence indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the matter, stating that it demonstrated a deliberate delay in the proceedings. The case stemmed from an application filed by Iliyas in August 2024, alleging that Mishra and others blocked roads and damaged street vendors' carts during protests. Initially dismissed by a magistrate for being legally impermissible, the application was later converted into a complaint requiring evidence. However, the complainant and his counsel did not present themselves in court, leading to the dismissal of the case due to non-prosecution.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the court should have pursued the case despite the complainant's absence?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




