Delhi High Court Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Over Defamatory Content
‘Extremely defamatory content against me’: Delhi High Court judge to initiate contempt in excise case
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has announced her intention to initiate contempt proceedings against individuals accused in the excise policy case for posting defamatory content against her. This decision comes as the court prepares to appoint senior advocates to represent key Aam Aadmi Party leaders in the ongoing case.
- 01Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma will initiate contempt proceedings against those posting defamatory content.
- 02The court is set to appoint senior advocates to represent AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Durgesh Pathak.
- 03The AAP leaders previously opted to go unrepresented, citing concerns over potential bias.
- 04Justice Sharma has been handling a revision plea from the Central Bureau of Investigation regarding a liquor policy scam.
- 05The AAP leaders have raised objections to Justice Sharma's alleged associations and her children's roles in government legal panels.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has taken cognizance of 'extremely vilifying and defamatory content' directed at her by some accused in the excise policy case. She plans to initiate contempt proceedings against these individuals. This announcement coincides with the court's preparations to appoint three senior advocates as amici curiae to represent Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders, including national convener Arvind Kejriwal and party leader Manish Sisodia, who previously chose to go without legal representation. Justice Sharma expressed her intention to act against the defamatory posts, stating that she cannot remain silent on such matters. The judge is currently overseeing a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) revision plea concerning the discharge of 23 accused in a liquor policy scam. The AAP leaders have expressed concerns about potential bias due to Justice Sharma's alleged affiliations and her children's connections to the Union government's legal panels. Despite these objections, the court has refused to grant their request for her recusal.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The initiation of contempt proceedings may influence public perception of the judicial process and accountability in high-profile cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judges should take action against defamatory content directed at them?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





