Gujarat High Court Overturns Rs 146.79 Lakh Demand from Reliance Industries for Water Charges
Gujarat High Court sets aside Rs 146.79 lakh bill to RIL for ‘unpaid water charges’
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The Gujarat High Court has annulled a Rs 146.79 lakh demand raised by the state government against Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) for unpaid water charges from 1997 to 2005. The court ruled that the state could not retroactively impose charges after a contract was concluded and payments were made.
- 01Gujarat High Court ruled against the state government's retrospective demand for water charges.
- 02The demand of Rs 146.79 lakh was deemed unfair as it was based on a resolution not acted upon.
- 03RIL had previously received a 'No Due Certificate' confirming all dues were paid.
- 04The court emphasized the principle of estoppel, preventing the state from reopening settled transactions.
- 05RIL's agreement with the state government dated November 9, 1993, was upheld as valid.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a landmark decision, the Gujarat High Court set aside a Rs 146.79 lakh ($176,000 USD) demand from the Gujarat state government against Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) for alleged unpaid water charges spanning from 1997 to 2005. Justice H M Prachchhak ruled that once a contract was executed and payments made, the state could not retroactively impose additional charges. The court noted that RIL had already paid dues as per earlier government resolutions and received a 'No Due Certificate' up to October 2003, which confirmed that all obligations were fulfilled. The demand arose from a notice issued in July 2005, which sought to recover the reassessed charges based on a government resolution from September 2002 that was not acted upon. The court highlighted that it would be unjust to demand arrears based on a resolution that had not been enforced. RIL argued that the retrospective reassessment violated contractual terms and established billing practices, emphasizing that any changes in charges should only be applied prospectively. This ruling reinforces the principle of contractual certainty and limits on retrospective state actions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling protects businesses from unexpected financial burdens due to retrospective demands, ensuring contractual agreements are honored.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should retrospective billing practices be banned in state contracts?
Connecting to poll...
More about Reliance Industries Ltd
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





