Judge Questions DOJ's Defense of Proposed Trump Coin Amid Legal Challenge
Judge exasperated by DOJ lawyer's 'long-winded' Trump coin defense: 'What's the purpose?'

Image: Raw Story
An Oregon judge expressed frustration during a hearing regarding a proposed gold coin featuring President Donald Trump's image, which is challenged by a lawsuit citing federal law prohibiting living individuals on U.S. currency. The judge questioned the DOJ's rationale for the coin, which aims to celebrate the nation's 250th anniversary.
- 01U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut criticized DOJ lawyer Kathryn Barragan's lengthy defense of the proposed coin.
- 02The lawsuit, filed by retired attorney James Rickher, argues that federal law prohibits images of living people on currency.
- 03The proposed Trump coin would have a face value of $2,026 and an estimated sale value of $90,000 for 47 coins.
- 04Rickher claims the coin would undermine the integrity of the coin collection market, affecting his personal collection's value.
- 05Barragan contends that Rickher lacks the necessary legal standing to challenge the coin's production.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
During a recent court hearing, U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut expressed exasperation with U.S. Justice Department lawyer Kathryn Barragan's defense of a proposed 24-karat gold coin featuring President Donald Trump's likeness. The lawsuit, initiated by retired attorney James Rickher, argues that federal law forbids images of living individuals on U.S. currency, a prohibition designed to prevent political self-promotion. Immergut interrupted Barragan, questioning the purpose of her lengthy arguments, which included references to historical exceptions. Rickher contended that the law does not differentiate between coins for circulation and those for commemoration. The proposed coin, intended to honor the nation's 250th anniversary, would have a face value of $2,026, with an estimated market value of $90,000 for the limited production of 47 coins. Rickher, asserting his legal standing, stated that the issuance of the Trump coin would damage the coin collection market's integrity. Barragan argued that Rickher lacked a personal stake in the matter and suggested that the challenge was premature, as the U.S. Treasury had not yet approved a final design for the coin.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The ruling on this lawsuit could set a precedent affecting future commemorative coins and the integrity of the coin collection market.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support or oppose the minting of a coin featuring a living president?
Connecting to poll...
More about U.S. Justice Department
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.







