Supreme Court Rules Private Properties of Former Rulers to Follow Personal Law, Not Primogeniture
Private properties of ex-rulers to devolve under personal law, not primogeniture: SC
&w=1200&q=75)
Image: Zee News
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that private properties of former princely rulers, specifically in the Kapurthala case, will devolve according to personal succession laws rather than the male lineal primogeniture rule. This decision overturns previous findings by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
- 01The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's ruling that favored Brigadier Sukhjit Singh's claim to exclusive property rights based on primogeniture.
- 02The court clarified that while the rule of primogeniture applies to succession of the throne, it does not extend to private properties of former rulers.
- 03The ruling emphasizes that after the merger with the Indian Union, former rulers became ordinary citizens, subject to regular personal succession laws.
- 04The judgment referenced the 1948 merger covenant and previous court rulings to support its decision.
- 05The court found that the properties in question are subject to taxation and acquisition like any ordinary private property.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India ruled that private properties belonging to former princely rulers, specifically in the case of the Kapurthala royal family, will be governed by personal succession laws rather than the traditional male lineal primogeniture. This ruling overturns the earlier findings of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had supported Brigadier Sukhjit Singh's claim to the properties based on primogeniture. The Supreme Court, led by Justices Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N. Bhatti, clarified that while the rule of primogeniture applies to the succession of the Gaddi (throne), it does not pertain to private properties declared by the rulers under the merger agreements. The court emphasized that following the merger with the Indian Union, former rulers became ordinary citizens, and their private properties should be treated as such, subject to standard personal succession laws. This ruling is significant as it aligns the succession of royal properties with contemporary legal standards, ensuring that they are not automatically inherited under outdated customs.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling impacts the legal framework surrounding the inheritance of properties belonging to former royal families, ensuring they are treated like any other private property.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What do you think about the Supreme Court's ruling on royal property succession?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.