Supreme Court Critiques Mamata Banerjee's Interference in I-PAC Investigation
"Mamata Banerjee's Actions Put Democracy In Jeopardy": Top Court In I-PAC Case
Ndtv
Image: Ndtv
The Supreme Court of India criticized West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for interfering in a central agency's investigation into the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC). The court emphasized that such actions jeopardize democracy, especially as the state prepares for elections.
- 01The Supreme Court disapproved of Mamata Banerjee's interference in an ongoing investigation.
- 02The Enforcement Directorate accused Banerjee of obstructing their investigation into I-PAC.
- 03The court highlighted the gravity of a Chief Minister undermining democratic processes.
- 04Judicial officers in Bengal faced threats during a separate electoral issue, prompting court intervention.
- 05The court warned against ignoring the socio-political realities affecting democracy in West Bengal.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court of India expressed strong disapproval of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's interference in an investigation by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) into the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC). The court stated that a Chief Minister should not disrupt an ongoing investigation, as it jeopardizes democracy, particularly with elections approaching. The ED accused Banerjee and state officials of obstructing their investigation, which included searches at I-PAC's offices. The court remarked that the framers of the Constitution would have condemned such actions. Additionally, the court noted a troubling incident where judicial officers were held hostage during a protest over alleged electoral roll manipulations in Malda district. This prompted the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to intervene, highlighting the urgent need to address the socio-political realities in West Bengal.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Supreme Court's remarks could influence the political landscape in West Bengal, particularly as elections approach, potentially affecting voter perceptions and the Trinamool Congress's standing.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe political leaders should be held accountable for interfering in investigations?
Connecting to poll...
More about Enforcement Directorate
Rohit Pawar and 16 Others Discharged in ₹25,000 Crore MSCB Scam Case
Hindustan Times • Apr 22, 2026
Supreme Court Rules Mamata Banerjee's Actions During ED Raid Do Not Constitute Centre-State Dispute
The Hindu • Apr 22, 2026
Supreme Court Criticizes Mamata Banerjee's Interference in I-PAC Raid Case
The Economic Times • Apr 22, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.