UN Court Affirms Right to Strike as Protected Under Labour Treaty
UN's top court says right to strike protected by key labour treaty

Image: News 18
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued a significant advisory opinion affirming that the right to strike is protected by a key labour treaty ratified by 158 countries. This ruling, requested by the International Labour Organisation, could influence global labour regulations and international trade agreements, despite the United States not having ratified the convention.
- 01The advisory opinion from the ICJ is not legally binding but is expected to influence global labour standards.
- 02The International Labour Organisation (ILO) requested the ICJ's opinion in response to an internal dispute regarding workers' rights.
- 03The convention protecting the right to strike has been ratified by 158 countries, highlighting its international significance.
- 04The ICJ's advisory opinion follows a previous ruling that countries could violate international law by failing to address climate change.
- 05During hearings, 18 countries and five international organisations supported the right to strike.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On May 21, 2023, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague delivered a landmark advisory opinion affirming that the right to strike is protected under a key labour treaty. This opinion was sought by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) to resolve a dispute regarding the treaty's implications for workers' rights. While advisory opinions from the ICJ are not legally binding, they carry significant influence and could shape labour regulations globally. The treaty in question has been ratified by 158 countries and is integrated into various international frameworks, including those of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and international trade agreements. Notably, the United States, a member of the ILO, has not ratified this convention. The ICJ's ruling comes after hearings in October 2022, where representatives from 18 countries and five international organisations expressed support for the right to strike. This decision follows the court's previous advisory opinion that indicated countries could be in violation of international law if they neglect to protect the environment from climate change, underscoring the court's role in addressing significant global issues.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling could lead to stronger protections for workers' rights globally, influencing national labour laws and international trade agreements.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support the right to strike for workers globally?
Connecting to poll...
More about International Court of Justice
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.







