Army Veteran Wins ₹1.4 Crore Duplex Dispute in Mohali
Mohali: Army veteran gets relief as panel flags gaps in ₹1.4 crore duplex deal
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The District Consumer Redressal Commission in Mohali ordered a builder to refund an Army veteran ₹1.4 crore for a duplex in Zirakpur due to possession being handed over without necessary approvals and a shortfall in the promised covered area. The builder must also pay interest and litigation costs.
- 01The commission ruled that the builder failed to provide valid completion and occupation certificates.
- 02The duplex delivered was smaller than what was agreed upon, leading to a refund order.
- 03Maintenance charges were collected by an unauthorized Residents' Welfare Association (RWA).
- 04The builder must pay 12% interest on the refunded amount until statutory certificates are obtained.
- 05The ruling emphasizes the importance of compliance with housing regulations.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The District Consumer Redressal Commission in Ropar, Punjab, ruled in favor of Colonel Romesh Ghai (retd) and his daughter regarding their purchase of a ₹1.4 crore duplex in Maya Garden City, Zirakpur. The commission found that the builder had handed over possession without obtaining necessary completion and occupation certificates as required under the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act (PAPRA). The complainants received a duplex with a covered area of only 4,769 sq. ft., significantly less than the 5,110 sq. ft. they paid for, leading to a refund for the shortfall of 342 sq. ft.. Additionally, the commission noted that maintenance charges of ₹5.45 lakh were collected by a Residents' Welfare Association (RWA) that was formed without legal authority, rendering those charges unauthorized. The builder's argument that partial completion certificates were sufficient was dismissed by the commission, which emphasized that the lack of valid certificates made the possession legally incomplete. The builder has been ordered to refund the amounts collected, secure the necessary certificates, and pay ₹75,000 in litigation costs, all within 45 days. This ruling underscores the need for builders to adhere to legal requirements and protect consumer rights.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling reinforces consumer rights in real estate transactions, potentially benefiting other homebuyers facing similar issues.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think stricter regulations are needed for real estate developers?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



