Indian Tax Department Challenges Tax Benefits for Jane Street Singapore
Income tax dept opposes benefits to Jane Street Singapore
The Economic TimesImage: The Economic Times
The Indian Income Tax Department has contested the treaty benefits claimed by Jane Street's Singapore arm, alleging tax evasion involving ₹8,000 crore (approximately $960 million USD) in income. This action is based on the Multilateral Instrument-Principal Purposes Test, which allows the denial of treaty benefits if tax avoidance is a principal motive.
- 01The Indian tax office is scrutinizing Jane Street Singapore's claimed treaty benefits.
- 02The case involves suspected escaped income of ₹8,000 crore (approximately $960 million USD).
- 03The Multilateral Instrument-Principal Purposes Test is being invoked to challenge tax benefits.
- 04Jane Street's operations in Singapore may lack sufficient commercial substance.
- 05The tax department's actions could lead to significant financial implications for Jane Street.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Indian Income Tax Department has raised concerns regarding the treaty benefits claimed by Jane Street's Singapore entity, alleging that the firm has evaded taxes on ₹8,000 crore (approximately $960 million USD) in income. This draft assessment order, sent at the end of March for the financial year 2023-24, invokes the Multilateral Instrument-Principal Purposes Test (MLI-PPT) under the India-Singapore tax treaty. The MLI-PPT allows the tax department to deny treaty benefits if it concludes that obtaining such benefits was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement. Jane Street, a high-frequency trading firm, is registered as a foreign portfolio investor (FPI) in Singapore and has been accused of using its Indian entities to influence market prices while booking profits in Singapore, where such profits are not taxed. The tax department's investigation has also considered the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), which targets aggressive tax planning, but opted for the broader MLI provision. The scrutiny raises questions about the economic substance of Jane Street's operations in Singapore, as the firm may not have a genuine presence there. The firm has the option to appeal against the draft order through the Dispute Resolution Panel or the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
If Jane Street is denied treaty benefits, it could face substantial tax liabilities, affecting its financial operations in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should tax authorities tighten regulations on foreign portfolio investors?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

