Supreme Court Justice Challenges Untouchability Concept in Sabarimala Case

Original: Woman can’t be ‘untouchable’ for 3 days a month: Justice Nagarathna on Sabarimala entry case

hindustantimes•Apr 7, 20263 min

In a Nutshell

Justice BV Nagarathna of India's Supreme Court questioned the notion of women being 'untouchable' during menstruation while hearing petitions regarding entry restrictions at the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. She emphasized that such discrimination contradicts the principles of equality and dignity enshrined in the Constitution.

Key Points

01Justice Nagarathna criticized the idea of temporary untouchability during menstruation.
02The Supreme Court is reviewing petitions against the exclusion of women from Sabarimala temple.
03Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the temple's restrictions are based on age, not menstruation.
04Justice DY Chandrachud previously linked the exclusion of women to untouchability and patriarchy.
05The case raises broader questions about religious freedom and gender equality in India.

In-Article Ad

Full Summary

During a Supreme Court hearing on petitions challenging the entry restrictions for women at the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, Justice BV Nagarathna expressed strong disapproval of the concept of women being considered 'untouchable' for three days a month. She stated that this practice contradicts the principles of equality and dignity outlined in Article 17 of the Indian Constitution, which prohibits untouchability. The case has garnered attention due to its implications for women's rights and religious practices. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the temple's restrictions, asserting that they are based on age rather than menstruation, emphasizing that Lord Ayyappa temples are open to women of all ages except in this specific case. This ongoing debate not only highlights the complexities of religious freedom but also challenges societal norms surrounding gender discrimination in India.

In-Article Ad

Why It Matters

The Supreme Court's decision could reshape access to religious sites for women, impacting gender equality and social norms in India.

Who is affected

Women seeking to enter the Sabarimala temple and other religious sites with similar restrictions.

What to know

Women and advocates for gender equality should monitor the case's progress and prepare to engage in discussions about religious practices and women's rights.

FAQ

The case addresses the exclusion of women aged 10-50 from entering the Sabarimala temple, raising questions about gender discrimination and religious freedom.

Justice Nagarathna argued that it is unacceptable for women to be considered 'untouchable' during menstruation, emphasizing that such discrimination is contrary to constitutional rights.

✦