NCDRC Halts Arrest Warrant Against Salman Khan in Rajasthan Advertising Case
NCDRC stays arrest warrant against Salman Khan in Rajasthan ‘misleading’ advertisement case
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has stayed the execution of bailable warrants against actor Salman Khan related to a misleading advertisement case in Rajasthan. The case involves allegations that Khan's promotion of Rajshree Pan Masala misled consumers and posed health risks.
- 01NCDRC has put a hold on bailable warrants against Salman Khan.
- 02The case concerns allegations of misleading advertisements for Rajshree Pan Masala.
- 03A consumer complaint was filed by Yogendra Singh Badiyal, seeking a penalty of ₹50 lakh.
- 04The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission issued warrants for non-compliance with an interim stay.
- 05Khan's legal team argues that the District Commission lacked jurisdiction in this matter.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has temporarily stayed the execution of bailable warrants against Bollywood actor Salman Khan in a case concerning misleading advertisements for Rajshree Pan Masala. The legal dispute originated from a complaint by Yogendra Singh Badiyal, an advocate and social worker, who accused Khan of promoting a product that is harmful to public health through deceptive advertising featuring 'silver-coated elaichi' (cardamom). Badiyal is seeking a penalty of ₹50 lakh (approximately $60,000 USD) and a permanent ban on the advertisements. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) in Rajasthan had issued an interim order on January 6, restraining Khan and the manufacturer from continuing the advertisements until a response was filed. However, Badiyal later alleged contempt of court, claiming that advertisements continued to be displayed despite the stay, leading to the issuance of the bailable warrant. Khan's legal team contended that the DCDRC lacked jurisdiction under Section 89 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, arguing that only the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) or an authorized officer could initiate such proceedings.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This case highlights the legal responsibilities of celebrities in advertising and consumer protection, potentially influencing how advertisements are regulated in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think celebrities should be held accountable for misleading advertisements?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



