On April 2, 2026, the Rajasthan High Court issued a correction to its March 30 judgment concerning transgender rights, specifically removing an epilogue that had been mistakenly included. This epilogue had critiqued amendments to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, emphasizing the right to self-identify one's gender as a constitutional guarantee. The court, led by Justices Arun Monga and Yogendra Kumar Purohit, clarified that the original epilogue's content was neither intended nor necessary, and ordered its deletion from the official judgment. The revised epilogue now limits the court's observations to the legal framework as it existed on March 30, effectively narrowing the scope of the judgment and avoiding unintended commentary on the evolving legal landscape. This correction reflects the court's intent to maintain the integrity of its judgments while ensuring that judicial observations are confined to necessary issues for adjudication. The ruling highlights the sensitivity surrounding transgender rights jurisprudence in India, particularly amid legislative changes that may impact previously established constitutional interpretations.