Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Royalties to Wright Prospecting
Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting to pay hundreds of millions’ worth of royalties to rival family in ‘half loss half win’
theguardian
Image: theguardian
In a significant ruling by the Western Australian Supreme Court, Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting has been ordered to pay Wright Prospecting 50% of royalties from the Hope Downs iron ore project, amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. The court dismissed Wright's claims to ownership of other mining assets, marking a partial victory for both parties.
- 01Hancock Prospecting must pay Wright Prospecting 50% of royalties from Hope Downs.
- 02The ruling is a landmark decision by the Western Australian Supreme Court.
- 03Wright Prospecting's claims to ownership of other Hancock assets were dismissed.
- 04The case dates back to 2010, highlighting a long-standing legal dispute.
- 05The Hope Downs project is a joint venture with Rio Tinto and generated an $832 million profit in 2025.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting has been mandated by the Western Australian Supreme Court to pay 50% of royalties from the Hope Downs iron ore project to Wright Prospecting, a decision that could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars. Justice Jennifer Smith stated that Wright Prospecting successfully established its contractual claim for royalties from the project, while its claims to ownership of other mining assets held by Hancock were dismissed. This ruling is seen as a significant outcome in a legal battle that has been ongoing since 2010. The complex case, which involved claims dating back to the 1950s, concluded with a judgment that is expected to exceed 1,600 pages. The Hope Downs project, located near Newman in north-west Western Australia, is a joint venture with Rio Tinto and has been profitable for Hancock Prospecting, generating an $832 million profit in 2025. Wright Prospecting, represented by heirs including billionaire Angela Bennett, argued they were entitled to a share of the royalties due to historical claims related to the original prospectors. Hancock Prospecting countered that it had assumed all risks and responsibilities associated with the project.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling could significantly affect the financial landscape for both companies involved, particularly impacting future investments and operational strategies.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think the court's ruling on mining royalties is fair?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


