The Case for Boycotting Racist States: A Call to Action
Should Black athletes boycott racist states? Yes. Everyone should.

Image: Los Angeles Times
Context
The NAACP has launched a campaign urging Black athletes and supporters to boycott public universities in states that are redrawing congressional maps to dilute Black political power. This initiative is a response to recent Supreme Court rulings that have weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965, allowing for systemic disenfranchisement.
What The Author Says
The author argues that Black athletes should heed the NAACP's call to boycott states that perpetuate systemic racism and disenfranchisement. This boycott is not just a protest but a necessary step toward social justice and equality.
Key Arguments
📗 Facts
- 80% of the 341 'persistent poverty' counties in the U.S. are located in the South.
- The NAACP's 'Out of Bounds' campaign was launched in response to recent Supreme Court rulings that weaken the Voting Rights Act.
- Nearly 42% of Americans live in states where Republicans control both the governor's mansion and state legislature.
📕 Opinions
- The author believes that boycotting states that perpetuate racism is a necessary action for Black athletes.
- The author argues that racism affects all Americans, not just those who are directly targeted.
Counterpoints
Boycotts may harm local economies and communities.
Some argue that boycotting could negatively impact local communities that rely on sports for economic support, potentially harming those who are not responsible for systemic issues.
Not all states are equally oppressive.
Critics may contend that not all states targeted by the boycott have the same level of systemic racism, and a blanket boycott may overlook nuanced differences.
Athletes may face backlash for their activism.
There is a concern that Black athletes who engage in boycotts may face significant backlash from fans, sponsors, and media, which could affect their careers.
Bias Assessment
The author emphasizes the need for action against systemic racism but may overlook the complexities of individual state dynamics.
Why This Matters
The ongoing issues of systemic racism and political disenfranchisement in the United States are particularly acute in Southern states, where historical patterns of poverty and inequality persist. Recent legislative actions have raised concerns about the erosion of voting rights for Black citizens.
🤔 Think About
- •How might a boycott affect communities that rely on sports for economic stability?
- •What are the potential consequences for athletes who choose to boycott?
- •In what ways can allies support the boycott without being directly involved?
- •How can we address systemic racism in a way that includes all affected communities?
Opens original article on Los Angeles Times
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should Black athletes boycott states that perpetuate racism?
Connecting to poll...

&w=1200&q=75)

&w=1200&q=75)