The ongoing Sabarimala case, which concerns women's access to the temple, has broader implications for the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India. Article 44 of the Constitution envisions a UCC to unify personal laws governing marriage, divorce, and inheritance across communities. Currently, various communities operate under their personal laws, some of which are codified while others, like the Muslim Personal Law, remain uncodified. The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is now tasked with addressing significant questions regarding women's rights and the constitutionality of exclusionary customs. Justice Joymalya Bagchi's inquiry about an 'incremental Uniform Civil Code' suggests that the court may take a piecemeal approach to dismantling regressive practices until comprehensive legislation is enacted. Historical cases, such as Shah Bano's right to maintenance and the striking down of instant triple talaq, illustrate the urgent need for harmonizing personal laws. The court's ruling could redefine the intersection of religious freedoms and women's rights, potentially leading to a more equitable society.